| Image; I.G |
The conversation around Nigeria’s long-standing electricity challenges has been reignited after comments attributed to activist and lawyer Deji Adeyanju began circulating widely online, drawing both criticism and counterarguments from public commentators and social media users.
In the widely shared remarks, Adeyanju was quoted as saying, “Nigerians don’t need 24/7 electricity; most people just need light from around 8pm to 7am for basic comfort.” The statement quickly became a talking point across digital platforms, with many Nigerians questioning the practicality of such a view in a country where businesses, small enterprises, and even essential services depend heavily on constant electricity supply.
The reaction gained more momentum when social commentator Daniel Regha responded strongly to the position. He dismissed the argument as unrealistic and disconnected from the everyday struggles of citizens who continue to face rising production costs due to unreliable power supply.
Regha did not hold back in his criticism, stating, “Deji Adeyanju is proof that some youths are no different from our present leaders. What a rubb’sh argument.” He argued that electricity should be treated as a fundamental public service rather than a conditional privilege tied to limited usage hours.
He further explained that the impact of unstable electricity extends beyond household comfort. According to him, businesses across various sectors rely on steady power to function efficiently, and the absence of it forces them to depend on expensive alternatives such as generators and fuel. This, in turn, increases the cost of goods and services, placing additional pressure on consumers already dealing with economic hardship.
Regha emphasized that the idea of restricting electricity access to nighttime use fails to reflect the realities of production, storage, and service delivery in a modern economy. He maintained that in a functional system, electricity should be consistent, affordable, and accessible without segmentation into usage bands.
Adding a more personal tone to his criticism, he also questioned Adeyanju’s professional credibility, saying, “This is coming from a supposed laywer, but no surprises; Someone that couldn’t even bail his client in times of trouble.”
The exchange has since fueled broader conversations about governance, infrastructure investment, and the expectations citizens should reasonably have from public utilities in Nigeria. Many online users have since weighed in, with opinions divided between defending the need for realistic energy reforms and insisting on full-scale improvements to achieve uninterrupted power supply.
As the discussion continues to trend, it reflects the deeper frustrations surrounding energy access and the contrasting views on how quickly Nigeria can transition to a stable electricity system.
#ElectricityDebate
#NigeriaPowerCrisis
#DanielRegha
Leave a Reply